
For eighty years, Britain has been trying to live up to this promise: "Build the homes the nation needs." For those same eighty years, governments have fallen short. Britain became the nation that stopped building. The cost is paid not just in rent and mortgages, but in productivity, mobility and generational fairness. We used to understand homes were as vital to national wellbeing as hospitals, railways or energy grids, though. So, how did we end up setting smaller targets and still missing them?

Manchester's city centre has been on the up for a decade - population, cranes and rent. But are we seeing the height of the boom, or is this just the middle act of a much longer story. Our question is whether delivery still matches demand. Maybe lettings and occupancy trends hold the answers to what's in store for the next cycle, are we building enough for the city-centre core, and who's actually in the city's spaces?

When it comes to regeneration, the UK loves to lead with PR. A nice slogan here, a fancy bit of CGI there and a soft-touch masterplan. But over in Europe, the most successful neighbourhoods grew from frameworks. Clear, civic enforceable frameworks backed by patient delivery and long-term political courage. What can we learn from them and how can we switch modes?
















